Search

How QM Harms Homeowners -House Committee Hearing

by devteam January 15th, 2014 | Share

The House Financial Services Committee heardrntestimony from five persons, almost all representing mortgage lenders, at arnhearing today entitled How Prospectivernand Current Homeowners Will Be Harmed by the CFPB’s Qualified Mortgage Rule.  Given the title of the hearing it is notrnsurprising that four of the five spoke out against the regulations.</p

Jack Hartings, President and CEO of The Peoples Bank</bCompany and Vice Chairman of the Independent Community Bankers of America toldrnthe committee that reform of QM is a key plank of ICBA's Regulatory ReliefrnAgenda.  </p

Mortgage lending by community banks representsrnapproximately 20 percent of the national mortgage market and is often the onlyrnsource of mortgage lending in the small communities they serve, he said.  The 20 percent actually understates the significancernof their mortgage lending as they make a larger share of their home purchase loansrnto low-or moderate-income borrowers or borrowers in low- or moderate-incomernneighborhoods and make a larger share of home purchase loans than loans forrnother purposes such as refinancing or home improvement. </p

Hartings said there is question that the QM rulernwill adversely affect his own bank’s mortgage lending even though it qualifiesrnas a small creditor making fewer than 500 mortgage loans annually and having lessrnthan $2 billion in assets.  “Even thoughrnmy asset size is well below the $2 billion, in 2012 I made 493 mortgage loans.  We believe this threshold is far too low andrnis not consistent with the asset threshold.”   He later pointed out that such low thresholdsrncould prevent his bank from expanding its lending as the economy recovers.</p

Non-QM loans will be subject to significant legal risk</bunder the Ability to Repay (ATR) rule and the liability for violations is draconian,rnhe said.   Non-compliance with ATR could also serve as a defensernto foreclosure if the loan is deemed not to be a QM loan and small communityrnbanks do not have the legal resources to manage this degree of risk. Thus thesernbanks, he said, will not continue to make some of the loans they have made inrnthe past such as low dollar amount loans, balloon payment mortgages, and higherrnpriced mortgage loans.</p

The full impact of ATR goes beyond QM compliance asrnbanks must still analyze each loan for ATR compliance, a costly and time consumerrnprocedure.  It is necessary to expectrnthat regulators will want to see documentation of the eight ATR underwritingrnfactors and if they are not sufficient the asset could be downgraded andrnsubject to high capital requirements.  </p

Without “small creditor” status, he said, his loans willrnbe subject to a 43 percent debt-to-income limitation, a lower price trigger forrn”high cost” QM status which carries higher liability risk, and restrictions on balloonrnloans.  ICBA is urging Congress to raise thernloan volume threshold. The problem could be easily addressed by disregarding loansrnsold into the secondary market in applying the threshold,” Hartings said. </p

Daniel Weickenand CEO, Orion Federal Credit Union testifyingrnon behalf of The NationalrnAssociation of Federal Credit Unions said that credit unions have always been somernof the most highly regulated of all financial institutions, facing restrictionsrnon who they can serve and their ability to raise capital and the Federal CreditrnUnion Act has strict consumer protection rules. rnDespite the fact that they were not the cause of the financial crisis, theyrnare still firmly within the regulatory reach of rules promulgated by CFPB. </p

The impact of this growing compliance burden is evidentrnas the number of credit unions continues to decline, he said, dropping by morernthan 900 institutions since 2009.  Onerncause of this decline is the increasing cost and complexity of complying with thernever-increasing onslaught of regulations. rn”We remain concerned about the QM standard and that this rule will potentiallyrnreduce access to credit and hamper the ability of credit unions to continue to meetrntheir member’s needs,” he said. </p

A number of mortgage products sought by credit unionrnmembers and offered by credit unions are non-QM loans and may disappear from thernmarket.  He said a forty-year mortgage loan,rna product sought by credit union members in high costs areas, exceeds the maximumrnloan term for QMs, and because of a problematic definition, a number of credit unionsrnmake mortgage loans with points and fees greater than 3% because they can leveragernrelationships with affiliates to get the best deal for their members. </p

Because a credit union will not receive any presumptionrnof compliance with the ability-to-repay requirements for a non-QM loan, the leastrnrisk to credit unions would be to originate only QM loans.  His own credit union, Weickenand said, hasrndecided to go that route and a recent NAFCU survey revealed that a majority of creditrnunions will cease or greatly reduce their offerings of non-QMs. </p

Weickenand said that NAFCU strongly supports bipartisanrnpieces of legislation in the House (H.R. 1077/ H.R. 3211) to alter the definitionrnof “points and fees” prescribed by the QM standard and an exemption from the QMrncap on points and fees: (1) affiliated title charges, (2) double counting of loanrnofficer compensation, (3) escrow charges for taxes and insurance, (4) lender-paidrncompensation to a correspondent bank, credit union or mortgage brokerage firm, andrn(5) loan level price adjustments which is an upfront fee that the Enterprises chargernto offset loan-specific risk factors such as a borrower’s credit score and the loan-to-valuernratio.</p

Like Hartings, he supports an increase in the exemption’srnasset size and 500 mortgage thresholds. rnHe said many credit unions are approaching one or both thresholds whichrnwill render the small lender exemption moot for them.  </p

The Association also believes that all mortgages heldrnin portfolio should be exempt from the QM rule not just small credit unions andrnwould like to be able to continue to offer mortgages of 40 years or lessrnduration as QMs.  NAFCU also supportsrnCongress directing the CFPB to revise aspects of the ‘ability-to-repay’ rule thatrndictates a consumer have a total debt-to-income (DTI) ratio of 43 percent orrnless which will prevent otherwise healthy borrowers from obtaining mortgage loansrnand will have a particularly serious  impactrnin rural and underserved  areas where consumersrn have  a limited number of options. </p

Bill Emerson, CEO of QuickenrnLoans and Vice Chairman of the Mortgage Bankers Associationrnspoke on behalf of the trade group, starting his testimony by saying, “Irncan tell you categorically that Quicken Loans, like the overwhelming majority</bof lenders, will not lend outside the boundaries of QM. In fact, even if wernwanted to, we wouldn't be able to make non-QM loans because there is no discernablernsecondary market for them. The only place these loans can be kept is on arnbank’s balance sheet.”</p

“Beyond that, the liability for originatingrnnon-QM is simply too great. Claimants can sue for actual and statutory damages,rnas well as a refund of their finance charges and attorney’s fees, and there isrnno statute of limitations in foreclosure claims. By MBA’s calculations,rnprotracted litigation for an average loan can exceed the cost of the loanrnitself.</p

Given this uncertainty, at least for the foreseeablernfuture he said non-QM lending is likely to be limited to three categories; loansrnwhere there are unintended mistakes, higher balance and non-traditional loansrnto wealthier borrowers, and loans made by a few lenders to riskier borrowers,rnbut at significantly higher rates. He said the rate sheets he had seen suggestrnborrowers could pay an interest rate of 9-10 percent for non-QM loans.</p

Emerson said it remains very important to makernadjustments to the QM rule. “The CFPB (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau) deservesrnenormous credit for working with all stakeholders, lenders and consumer groupsrnalike, and fashioning a rule we think is a substantial improvement overrnDodd-Frank. We are also grateful the Bureau is open to making additionalrnrevisions in the near future.” </p

There is a major problem with the 3 percent cap onrnpoints and fees for QM eligibility. rnBecause so many origination costs are fixed, a lot of smaller loans, particularlyrnin the $100,000 to $150,000 range, will trip the 3 percent cap and fall outsidernthe QM definition, pricing consumers, especially first-time homebuyers andrnfamilies living in rural and underserved areas, out of the market. </p

“Additionally, the final rule picks winners andrnlosers between affiliated and unaffiliated settlement service providers, evenrnthough their fees are subject to identical regulation. At Quicken Loans, wernhave chosen to affiliate with title and other service providers to ensure ourrncustomers have the best loan experience and that there are no surprises at thernclosing table.”  His company, he said,rnhas won awards because its affiliated arrangements have led to a smooth closingrnprocess.</p

Emerson said the MBA urges the House to promptlyrnpass H.R. 3211, the Mortgage Choice Act. </p

Michael D. Calhoun, President of the Center for ResponsiblernLending was the only one of the five presenting testimony in favor of the CFPB’srnrules.  Calhoun said those rules strikernthe right balance of providing borrower protections while also ensuring accessrnto credit.  </p

The QM rule covers 95 percent of current originations</baccording to Moody Analytics he said that this broad coverage is because CFPB establishedrnfour different pathways for a mortgage to gain QM status. The first uses a 43rnpercent back-end debt-to-income ratio. A second is based on eligibility for purchasernby Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and a third is specifically crafted for small creditorsrnholding loans in portfolio. Lastly, there is a pathway for balloon loans as well.rnThis multi-faceted approach will maintain access to affordable credit for borrowers.</p

“This broad definition is key for borrowers, includingrnborrowers of color who represent 70% of the net household growth through 2023.  The broad definition means that borrowers willrnnot be boxed out of getting a home loan and will also benefit from the protectionsrnthat come with a Qualified Mortgage.  Inrnaddition, several lenders have said they will originate mortgages that do notrnmeet QM requirements, holding them in their own portfolios.  Calhoun said he expects this will only growrnover time.  </p

As a whole, these rules continue the CFPB’s approachrnof expanding access to credit while ensuring that loans are sustainable for thernborrower, the lender and the overall economy, Calhoun said.</p

Also testifying was Frank Spencer, President and CEPrnof Habitat for Humanity’s Charlotte, North Carolina Chapter.  Spencer was primarily asking for relief fromrnQM and ATR requirements for his organization which currently services approximatelyrn780 mortgages.  Spencer said that despiternthe fact that the mortgages are non-interest bearing and that most of thernchapters that originate them fall far below the thresholds of QM, some of therncharity’s operations trigger the requirements and present significant liabilityrnfor its officers and community partners. rn

All Content Copyright © 2003 – 2009 Brown House Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.nReproduction in any form without permission of MortgageNewsDaily.com is prohibited.

About the Author

devteam

Steven A Feinberg (@CPAsteve) of Appletree Business Services LLC, is a PASBA member accountant located in Londonderry, New Hampshire.

See all blogs
Share

Comments

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Latest Articles

Real Estate Investors Skip Paying Loans While Raising Billions

By John Gittelsohn August 24, 2020, 4:00 AM PDT Some of the largest real estate investors are walking away from Read More...

Late-Stage Delinquencies are Surging

Aug 21 2020, 11:59AM Like the report from Black Knight earlier today, the second quarter National Delinquency Survey from the Read More...

Published by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

It was recently published by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, which is about as official as you can Read More...