Search

CFPB Fines Lender over Expense Accounts

by devteam June 6th, 2015 | Share

For the second time this week thernConsumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has filed in federal court againstrna lender for unfair compensation practices. rnToday’s complaint was levied against RPM Mortgage, Inc. and its CEO, Erwin Robert Hirt, for illegallyrnpaying bonuses and higher commissions to loan originators to incentivize themrnto steer consumers into costlier mortgages. rnThe complaint was accompanied by a proposed order asking the court tornrequire RPM to pay $18 million in redress to consumers and a $1 million civilrnpenalty, and compel an additional $1 million civil penalty payment from Hirt. </p

RPMrnMortgage, Inc. is a residential-mortgage lender headquartered in California andrnoperating about sixty branches in six states. rnCFPB contends that, under a plan originated in April 2011, RPM providedrnits loan officers with different forms of compensation that were derived inrnpart from the interest rates of the loans they closed.  </p

“RPMrnrewarded its loan officers for steering consumers into mortgages with higherrninterest rates,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “Today we are putting anrnend to RPM’s unlawful practices and holding Robert Hirt personally responsiblernfor his involvement in them.” </p

Therncomplaint alleges that RPM sought to mask this arrangement by filtering itrnthrough so-called “employee-expense accounts,” depositing profits from closedrnloans – profits that were directly tied to the loans’ interest rates – into anrnexpense account set up for the originator.  RPM used the expense accounts to pay bonusesrnand higher commissions to its loan originators and allowed those originators torntap the accounts to offset interest-rate reductions or give credits to certainrncustomers to avoid losing the transactions to competitors. RPM paid or financedrnmillions of dollars in unlawful bonuses, pricing concessions, and supplemental commissions. </p

The announcementrnof the enforcement action from CFPB noted that the Loan Originator CompensationrnRule has prohibited incentivizing loan originators to steer consumers torncostlier mortgages since 2011 and that Hirt was responsible for managing therndesign and implementation of this illegal compensation plan.  </p

Thernplan incentivized loan officers to saddle consumers with costlier loans tornincrease the loan officers’ compensation violating not only the Loan OriginatorrnCompensation Rule but also the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA)rnby: </p<ul type="disc"

  • Funding millionsrn of dollars in illegal bonuses:  From April 2011 through January 2012 511 bonusesrn were paid to loan originators from their individual employee-expensern accounts; funds based in part on the interest rates of the loans thern originators closed. </li
  • Paying tens ofrn millions of dollars in higher commissions based on high-interestrn loans:  At the end ofrn 2011, RPM stopped paying bonuses from the employee-expense accounts.rn Instead, it allowed loan originators to use the employee-expense accountsrn to supplement their commissions on future transactions. Loan officers werern able to reset their commission rates on future loans by usingrn employee-expense account funds to cover the increased costs. In this way,rn profits from earlier high-interest loans were converted into tens ofrn millions of dollars in commission income. </li
  • Allowing loanrn officers to use expense accounts to pay for pricing incentives to closern new mortgages: rn From April 2011 through December 2013, RPM allowed loan originators to usern their expense accounts to finance thousands of pricing concessions thatrn enabled the loan officers to close and earn commissions on transactionsrn they otherwise would have lost. This “point bank” arrangement allowed loanrn originators to “bank” profits extracted from certain consumers thatrn enabled them to close on and receive additional compensation from loans torn future consumers. </li</ul

    OnrnMonday CFPB along with the Department of Justice filed a consent order againstrnProvident Funding Associates, another California lender, for $9 million inrndamages.  Provident was accused ofrnsetting up a compensation arrangement that rewarded mortgage brokers forrnoriginating higher priced loans.  Thatrncomplaint carried with it additional claims of discrimination againstrnAfrican-American and Hispanic borrowers, prompting the Justice Department’srninvolvement.

    All Content Copyright © 2003 – 2009 Brown House Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.nReproduction in any form without permission of MortgageNewsDaily.com is prohibited.

  • About the Author

    devteam

    Steven A Feinberg (@CPAsteve) of Appletree Business Services LLC, is a PASBA member accountant located in Londonderry, New Hampshire.

    See all blogs
    Share

    Comments

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    Latest Articles

    Real Estate Investors Skip Paying Loans While Raising Billions

    By John Gittelsohn August 24, 2020, 4:00 AM PDT Some of the largest real estate investors are walking away from Read More...

    Late-Stage Delinquencies are Surging

    Aug 21 2020, 11:59AM Like the report from Black Knight earlier today, the second quarter National Delinquency Survey from the Read More...

    Published by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

    It was recently published by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, which is about as official as you can Read More...