Search

Further State Involvement in Mortgage Servicing Needed to Prevent Foreclosures

by devteam April 9th, 2013 | Share

Two consumer advocacy groups have outlined how staternlawmakers can bolster safeguards to prevent unnecessary foreclosures.  The Center for Responsible Lending (CRL) andrnConsumers Union (CU) said in their report, Closingrnthe Gap:  What States Should Do tornProtect Homeowners from Foreclosure that, while the foreclosure crisis was caused inrnlarge part by unscrupulous lending practices that went unregulated, servicing abuses – including the failure to engage in good faith loss mitigation before beginning the foreclosurernprocess – have exacerbated the problem.rn</p

While there have been recent advancements includingrnthe National Mortgage Settlement (NMS), the California HomeownerrnBillrnof Rights (HBOR), and new mortgage servicing rules from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) that go into effect in January 2014, millions of families remain poisedrnto lose their homes andrncommunities remain at risk for the spillover effects of foreclosures.  The two organizations said there is room forrnstates to build on the above reforms and help avoid unnecessary foreclosures.  </p

The paper goes into considerable detail pointing to areasrnwhere, for example, the HBOR offers protections not available in the CFPB rulesrnand some shortcomings of those rules.  Most importantly, its says, states should add private enforcement that gives homeowners a means to pause the foreclosure process while the servicer corrects violations of the law and encourages servicers to consider loss mitigation alternatives. Although the CFPB rules will be applicable in all states, homeownersrnwill not have the right to prevent unlawful foreclosurernsales while servicers correct legal violations,rnunless states adopt strongerrnprivate enforcementrnprovisions.</p

Over the last several years, some ofrnthe most significant problems have included the failure to review homeownersrnfor a loan modification and foreclosing on borrowers even as the servicer isrnconsidering an application for a modification (commonly referred to as “dualrntracking”). </p

By adopting a Homeowner Bill ofrnRights to help reduce as many foreclosures as possible, states would stabilizernlocal housing markets and protect homeowners. In the report, CRL and CU urgernstate lawmakers to:'</p<ul

  • Require servicers to adopt and engage in loss mitigation practices.  There should be an explicit duty to engage in loss mitigation analysis before the foreclosure process is commenced.  Loss mitigation benefits both the homeowner and the mortgage holder by seeking solutions that would allow homeowners to remain in their homes and providing mortgage holders with a means to mitigate their own losses.  Because HAMP is due to expire at the end of 2013 it is even more imperative that servicers be required to engage in a loss mitigation assessment.</li</ul<ul
  • Restrict lenders/servicers from dual tracking at both the pre-foreclosure and post-foreclosure referral stages, while providing homeowners with reasonable deadlines and a right to appeal.  The CFPB rule that prohibits a foreclosure start before the 120th day of delinquency or while a loss mitigation application is pending should be universal.  Homeowners should also have the right to appeal a loan modification denial when they have met dual track guidelines.</li</ul<ul
  • Give homeowners the right to stop a foreclosure sale when the lender/servicer has violated the law.  RESPA does not allow homeowners to prevent a foreclosure sale when servicers violate the rules’ requirements to policymakers should implement a strong enforceability measure that gives homeowners the right to suspend a foreclosure sale when a servicer has not complied with loss mitigation rules, and until it does so.</li</ul<ul
  • Require servicers to establish procedures for homeowner outreach, detailed denial notices, and an affidavit requirement. </li</ul

    The report says that when servicers fail to employ viable loss mitigation tools, the foreclosure crisis is exacerbated,  “By ensuring that servicers examine all possible foreclosure alternatives and by promoting clarity, transparency, and accountability in the loss mitigation process, states will help more homeowners avoid unnecessary foreclosures and keep more people in their homes.  This, in turn, will benefit everyone by reducing the spillover impact of foreclosures and by helping to stabilize the state’s economy and housing market.

    All Content Copyright © 2003 – 2009 Brown House Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.nReproduction in any form without permission of MortgageNewsDaily.com is prohibited.

  • About the Author

    devteam

    Steven A Feinberg (@CPAsteve) of Appletree Business Services LLC, is a PASBA member accountant located in Londonderry, New Hampshire.

    See all blogs
    Share

    Comments

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    Latest Articles

    Real Estate Investors Skip Paying Loans While Raising Billions

    By John Gittelsohn August 24, 2020, 4:00 AM PDT Some of the largest real estate investors are walking away from Read More...

    Late-Stage Delinquencies are Surging

    Aug 21 2020, 11:59AM Like the report from Black Knight earlier today, the second quarter National Delinquency Survey from the Read More...

    Published by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

    It was recently published by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, which is about as official as you can Read More...